Close
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Dubai
    Posts
    12
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanked 18 Times in 5 Posts

    ALP Sensor group firing question. ( Rear Set-Front Set)

    ALP 5 sensor set up.
    background for this question.
    I have done a bunch of AutoCad drawings that show all the angles of incidence that i may get a alert from, during this process we have overlapped the sensors array/FOV and adjusted the install angles of the sensors specifically to give best protection against the German revenue generator for my specific truck. ( F150 Raptor 4 door)
    during this process we found that the best coverage was to have 5 sensors located in different strategic places, one of those locations was in the wing mirror facing forward at an angle of 24 Deg. ( yes, side facing)
    During this logical reiterative process the question arouse as to what happens when you get a hit and only one sensor receives the attack.

    From a logical POV if the system is labeled such that Front-Rear then i would assume that if any of the single front 3 sensors gets hit then all 3 sensors fire back for security regardless of which one took the initial hit.
    However, what happens if we install all 5 sensors at the front and one of the two labeled "rear sensors" receives a hit, will only the "two rear" sensors fire back? ( based in the logic above i would say yes, but i hope im wrong.)

    If this is the case then i need to think about which sensors get plugged into which socket based on their physical location on the truck.
    If they all fire back regardless then it does not matter which sensor gets plugged into which socket.

    J.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,217
    Thanks Given
    655
    Thanked 1,018 Times in 503 Posts
    I had the same problem with my rear 5 sensors (poliscan)

    I had front ports mounted on the left side rear all diff angles and my 2 rear ports on the right side rear diff angles

    yes all sensors will work together

    but I did have some issues while testing with some lidar guns I was picking out the same week points every time seem to happen if I tagged one side only and then panned to the right or vise versa without a new trigger pull on the lidar gun ..so we mixed all the ports around to try and trigger a chain reaction .... once we swapped and mixed ports it was JFG every time

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Dubai
    Posts
    12
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanked 18 Times in 5 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by deano View Post
    I had the same problem with my rear 5 sensors (poliscan)

    I had front ports mounted on the left side rear all diff angles and my 2 rear ports on the right side rear diff angles

    yes all sensors will work together

    but I did have some issues while testing with some lidar guns I was picking out the same week points every time seem to happen if I tagged one side only and then panned to the right or vise versa without a new trigger pull on the lidar gun ..so we mixed all the ports around to try and trigger a chain reaction .... once we swapped and mixed ports it was JFG every time
    ahh, so what you are saying is your testing then proved that unless both front and rear sensors pick up the same signal then they act interdependently, so in order to combat the possible isolated receives you mixed front and rear ports on the same side in such a way that both front and rear ports receive the same signal at the same time, ish, then all 5 sensors counter attack. ( i think i got you.)

    Now i have to rethink all the angles as i need to have them cross over each other due to the extreme angles that Poliscan can perform

    Then a future suggestion for this ALP firmware (in another thread at the moment i think) would be to have the ability to select the grouping rather than have them fixed in one group of 3 and another group of 2.

    J.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Fletch For This Useful Post:

    Tman (06-12-2014)

  5. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    560
    Thanks Given
    213
    Thanked 357 Times in 194 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Fletch View Post
    Then a future suggestion for this ALP firmware (in another thread at the moment i think) would be to have the ability to select the grouping rather than have them fixed in one group of 3 and another group of 2.

    J.
    How else would you do it? There are 5 sensor ports on the ALP. You're not going to go 4/1, because 1 sensor can't jam VPR guns. I guess you could go 5/0 (all sensors together), but other than that, 3/2 is really the only option.

  6. #5
    Senior Member Clint Eastwood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Cali
    Posts
    246
    Thanks Given
    206
    Thanked 239 Times in 107 Posts
    Interesting, and this feeds into my speculation on the cable length thing, that the software calculates the time of arrival on each head, and, after calculating the proper counter pulse, it fires each head with appropriate nanosecond offsets, so that gun sees all of the returns in a synchronous manner.
    Go ahead, make my day.

  7. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Dubai
    Posts
    12
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanked 18 Times in 5 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by awj223 View Post
    How else would you do it? There are 5 sensor ports on the ALP. You're not going to go 4/1, because 1 sensor can't jam VPR guns. I guess you could go 5/0 (all sensors together), but other than that, 3/2 is really the only option.
    Correct, 5 and 0 in my case, for my front setup.

    however, I have two separate ALP systems, one for the front protection and one for the rear, now I know that front and rear groups operate independently ( unless both groups are hit at the same time) I will need to mount one of the 5 sensors, (specifically one in the front group as it has 3 ports in that group) for my rear setups on the front in order to catch reflections from the cars in front so my rear setup is already armed and firing back backwards with the other two in the front group mounted on the back.
    You may think this over kill but the issue we have here is the poliscan is setup to shoot from behind and overhead.( slip roads, bridges)

    J.

  8. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Dubai
    Posts
    12
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanked 18 Times in 5 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Clint Eastwood View Post
    Interesting, and this feeds into my speculation on the cable length thing, that the software calculates the time of arrival on each head, and, after calculating the proper counter pulse, it fires each head with appropriate nanosecond offsets, so that gun sees all of the returns in a synchronous manner.
    Now you have got me thinking, one or possibly two of my cables in my rear setup was/will need to have the extension options fitted, do I need to have all three cables in the same group in the same length?
    J.

  9. #8
    Senior Member Clint Eastwood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Cali
    Posts
    246
    Thanks Given
    206
    Thanked 239 Times in 107 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Fletch View Post
    Now you have got me thinking, one or possibly two of my cables in my rear setup was/will need to have the extension options fitted, do I need to have all three cables in the same group in the same length?
    J.
    According to Tom, this is not the case. Makes sense that the software handles any delta derived from mismatched cable lengths. I assume the CPU 'collects' the time stamps of off-to-on transition of a pulse for each head separately and measures the delta, if any, on reception.
    Go ahead, make my day.

  10. #9
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Dubai
    Posts
    12
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanked 18 Times in 5 Posts
    After testing and confirmation from the factory in the case of the PS hit on any sensor ALL sensors return fire regardless of group.
    Just to confirm what I'm saying, if you have 3 sensors on the front and two on the rear and you get a PS hit from the rear then your front sensors will also return fire in sync.
    So for those of us who have all 5 sensors facing the same direction it now makes no difference how we arrange the plugs in the control model any more.
    I believe that in the past the front and rear systems were separate, but this no longer the case just for a PS attack.
    FYI, led red is an attack on the front ports and yellow is an attack on the rear ports, in the case where PS attacks both front and rear ( left and right sides in my case) you get both red and yellow flashing at the same time. ( pro mode)
    J.

  11. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Fletch For This Useful Post:

    beingaware (07-09-2014), curmudgeon (07-09-2014), deano (07-09-2014), winterbrew (07-09-2014)

  12. #10
    Moderator winterbrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    1,803
    Thanks Given
    1,850
    Thanked 1,697 Times in 929 Posts
    Thanks Fletch - good to know for us afflicted with the Poliscan threat
    2 x ALPriority (Quint) with STi-R+ and BT/HiFi/GPS integration | V1C (sold) | Bel RX65 S7 | 2015 Intl Redline Pro-A (sold) | Uniden R3 | Uniden LRD950 (sold) | Stalker Lidar | UltraLyte LRB | Kustom Raptor RP-1 2 x K band, 1 x Ka band antennas | Decatur Genesis-II K band |

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •