Close
Results 1 to 10 of 127

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #9
    Senior Member Tman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,143
    Thanks Given
    1,485
    Thanked 783 Times in 373 Posts
    About collaboration between us , i completely agree. To put things in perspective , i will expose some historical facts.

    When Radar Roy offered a solution to lidar tickets , i bought a Blinder M-25 and a can of Veil .After reading a lot of pros and cons i decided to do a simple test.
    I used a led 905nm , a piece of clear plexiglass and a cell camera , i placed a good load of Veil and dried it. I bought a specialised dye certified to absorb 905 nm ,
    diluted it in alcool and made a stain on the plexi , alongside the Veil stain. I used the led to verify the absorbancy of both by transparency , the dye was absorbing
    the ir but not Veil . I made a 10 seconds video and posted it on RR site , it took few hours to have the video removed , the post deleted and me banned.
    To protect IP is full right , to hide\ignore\destroy\discard facts is another game.

    The difference here is huge , i can post my point of view\finding and not be banned , i am all for truth , if my findings are proven wrong\un-truthfull i will amend and apologise willfully.


    Quote Originally Posted by Rocketman59 View Post
    Come on guys and girls. We are all on the same side here. We have allot of people here who are smart and have different levels of experience. I guess one of the things that surprises me is how rarely some of you get shot by LIDAR. Here in North West Ohio it is a rare week that I do not get shot at least once. Last week 3 times. Once on local road enforcing 25 mph limit (Truespeed SX) and twice on tollway (LTI 20-20 Utralight), the other was un-known. I plan on removing the G5 from the plates and install Ontrack Laser Shield. I will coat headlights, parking lights with multi coats. I have a trip next week and have no time to install any active CM.

    I also think that to test G5 in a lab type environment would require same very expensive test equipment. Remember that the laser beam has to pass threw the G5 or G4, reflect off the surface underneath, then pass threw the G5 again going back the other direction. This will all add to signal (Laser) losses. I had a motor officer tell me he likes shiny new cars over dirty old ones because he can read there speed at greater distance. My background is RF energy. I have thousands invested in microwave test equipment and many of the same laws of physics apply. Lets all do our testing, document the results, and help each other come up with stealth cars and trucks that rob the city's and county's of there unfair tax collection. Anyway my two cents worth.

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Tman For This Useful Post:

    curmudgeon (03-21-2015), modsl55amg (03-21-2015), spankyaf (03-22-2015), The Only Sarge (03-21-2015)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •