Quote Originally Posted by RedRocket View Post
This is misunderstood by many & assumptions have been made which do not relate to reality.The advertizing claim craftily OMITS the operative word that would correctly describe its true operating parameters.In truth,the ad should state as follows - "...the highest rated power laser diode of any laser jammer." "Rated" & "actual operating conditions" have two different meanings & certainly should not be thought of as being equal OR the same thing.
The IR diode output is not producing anywhere near its rated capabilities.All one has to do is observe the intensity of each IR in a video display & to also consider the operating electrical current drawn by each Model:

AntiLaser Priority = 1250 ma.
Competitor 8.9 = 750 ma.

Viewing the IR video output of the "Competitor" also reveals another eye-opening "lack of quality" fact,the photon pattern output is completely speckled throughout w/ far to many weak & dead zone holes I equate to Black Holes that may allow for P/T's in your defense screen.

AntiLaser - Priority


Competitor 8.9
I agree, Its all a marketing ploy to advertise wattage being more powerful. We are not talking about brute force where more power would be helpful. There is no point is using a higher wattage diode than what is needed to do the job properly. In the past I used to do car audio installations and I could put a good quality amplifier against others that were rated at more than double the power and the lower better quality one would win all the time.