Close
Results 1 to 10 of 39

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #17
    Senior Member RedRocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    North America
    Posts
    2,057
    Thanks Given
    1,081
    Thanked 1,543 Times in 846 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Yellowcab View Post
    I realize that AntiLaser sells most of thier products outside of the U.S., and that is why you have many modules that appeal to prospective customers throughout the world. I also realize that AntiLaser does not take the cheap way out like other manufacturers do by purchasing less expensive and lower quality components. However, one complaint that I have heard is the higher cost of the ALP compared to its competitors. In the U.S. and on many forums one competing brand has won the respect and loyalty of the masses. Your competitor has brainwashed many that their product can not be out performed. They state that they have the highest power laser diode of any laser jammer. They also state that they frequently release firmware updates. To penetrate the U.S. market, you need to be more competitive with your pricing, and in the U.S. voice alerts must be included in the price of the "base unit." It is too hard a sell at higher price-point.

    Thank you for listening and producing a great laser jammer.
    This is misunderstood by many & assumptions have been made which do not relate to reality.The advertizing claim craftily OMITS the operative word that would correctly describe its true operating parameters.In truth,the ad should state as follows - "...the highest rated power laser diode of any laser jammer." "Rated" & "actual operating conditions" have two different meanings & certainly should not be thought of as being equal OR the same thing.
    The IR diode output is not producing anywhere near its rated capabilities.All one has to do is observe the intensity of each IR in a video display & to also consider the operating electrical current drawn by each Model:

    AntiLaser Priority = 1250 ma.
    Competitor 8.9 = 750 ma.

    Viewing the IR video output of the "Competitor" also reveals another eye-opening "lack of quality" fact,the photon pattern output is completely speckled throughout w/ far to many weak & dead zone holes I equate to Black Holes that may allow for P/T's in your defense screen.

    AntiLaser - Priority


    Competitor 8.9
    Last edited by RedRocket; 12-03-2013 at 08:48 AM.

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to RedRocket For This Useful Post:

    BestRadarDetectors (12-03-2013), curmudgeon (12-03-2013), shanetrainST (12-05-2013)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •