Close
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Senior Member modsl55amg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    South Jersey
    Posts
    197
    Thanks Given
    2,284
    Thanked 84 Times in 39 Posts

    Tom/BRD: Request Your Advice....Bubbles.....Outwards....or....Inwards

    Tom,

    I am seeing pictures of member's installs with the bubbles Inwards. I am aware of the reason for doing so, but what is your Expert recommendation? Whatever your advice may be, is it the same for all cars, or does the model/style of car and/or the exact position of the sensors on a car dictate if bubbles should be Outwards or Inwards?

    Thanks
    Last edited by modsl55amg; 11-14-2015 at 01:21 AM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Holla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    562
    Thanks Given
    92
    Thanked 275 Times in 172 Posts
    It does not matter, the sensors are so small the difference between in/out make no difference, he has mentioned that since day 1
    ALP Quint
    Red-Line 2/5/8

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Holla For This Useful Post:

    lamster (06-09-2016), modsl55amg (11-14-2015)

  4. #3
    Senior Member modsl55amg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    South Jersey
    Posts
    197
    Thanks Given
    2,284
    Thanked 84 Times in 39 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Holla View Post
    It does not matter, the sensors are so small the difference between in/out make no difference, he has mentioned that since day 1
    Thanks Holla,

    I know what Tom has stated since day 1. However, there seems to be a new trend of thought, espoused by an extremely knowledgeable user of the ALP system, who is also one of the most knowledgeable, if not THE most knowledgeable "shooter" here on the East coast, that although there is only a one inch difference in the bubble position if it is inverted on the car itself, that one inch, when projected hundreds, even a thousand feet or more ahead of a car, will cover/protect/defend a slightly wider angle to the sides of a car, which may be exactly where an "unfriendly shooter" may be positioned.

    For someone who has their sensors already installed, it may not be enough of a reason to invert the sensors so that they are bubbles inwards. However, I am having the sensors on my cars relocated and this is a good opportunity to make the change to bubbles inwards, instead of the bubbles outwards, that has been recommended since day 1, if there is even a slight advantage in protection obtained from doing so..

    I am just attempting to find out if there may be a change of thought in the position of the bubbles.

  5. #4
    Senior Member dinkydi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    cosmos
    Posts
    3,739
    Thanks Given
    4,432
    Thanked 1,222 Times in 911 Posts
    i think the angles are equal, one advantage to bubbles on the inside, is if they are slightly recessed in the grill with the body of the car protruding forward more at the outer edges from the the grill

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to dinkydi For This Useful Post:

    modsl55amg (11-15-2015)

  7. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    391
    Thanks Given
    208
    Thanked 223 Times in 110 Posts
    I will add...with my car..2015 civic si coupe has no real good place to put the heads...so i was questioning this as well...
    What was suggested is that I put a pin hole in my tester to narrow the beam and then test that way.
    I can tell you that with this method....yes it mad a difference...
    My thought on my set up it is.
    If I miss the signal from the Leo's lidar I'm screwed...so having the bubble outward (which is what sets the alps off) then I know I have a few seconds to slow...even if they do get a punch threw after I have slowed or while slowing...
    If they are flipped and I don't get an alert? Well there unless and theres no point to having them..
    So i think that, that half inch or so might...just might help when in a situation like I am...

    Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kimberdan For This Useful Post:

    koszor (05-21-2016), modsl55amg (11-15-2015)

  9. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    3
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    @kimberdan I have the same car where did you decide to mount the heads?

  10. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    391
    Thanks Given
    208
    Thanked 223 Times in 110 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by koszor View Post
    @kimberdan I have the same car where did you decide to mount the heads?
    Name:  uploadfromtaptalk1463827014525.jpg
Views: 493
Size:  59.1 KB
    If this is something you might be interested in doing pm me to discuss...its really quite easy..

    Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

  11. #8
    Senior Member radargeek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    York, SC
    Posts
    525
    Thanks Given
    116
    Thanked 571 Times in 270 Posts
    I prefer bubbles outward since it gives the bubbles a clearer view of the road esp. overhead (for overpass shots) due to the curve of the grill. The diode output starts out narrow coming from the head so recessing the emitter side a tiny bit should have no effect on jamming performance, but recessing the bubble could cause the sensing side to miss the beam from the gun.

    From a coverage standpoint bubbles in or out makes only an inch or so difference. If your heads are on the outer limits of distance apart (~24-25") bubbles in would help with picking up CM shots, while if they're close together bubbles out is better.
    Last edited by radargeek; 05-21-2016 at 08:43 AM.
    If I passed you on the right, YOU are in the wrong lane!

    2016 Encounters/Saves (to date): 33.8: 1/1 (last 4/13) | 34.7: 1/1 (last 3/11) | 35.5: 19/11 (last 8/28) | K: 1/1 (last 6/26)
    2015 Encounters/Saves: 33.8: 1/0 | 34.7: 13/4 | 35.5: 19/10 | K: 4/1 | LIDAR (sighted/hit with/save): 4/1/1

    ACTIVE CMs: Redline X, K, Ka 2,4,5,8 (highway/long trip RD) | New! V1C 3.8945 K, Ka CS, TMF2 w/YaV1 (in-town RD) | ALP Quad | BlackVue DR650GW-2CH

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to radargeek For This Useful Post:

    modsl55amg (06-22-2016)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •