-
Senior Member
'' I have not been able to see certainly at farther distances that Veil's own glossiness is a contributor. I just don't believe it.''
How can you write this ? From a person studying passive cm for more than 10 years !!! , more over the top you say ''i justdont believe it'' ...my dear Watson this is elementary ...
shine your flashlight on a mat painted wall versus a glossy finish....glossiness is a crucial contributor : it is so basic : specular reflection\diffuse reflection...come on .
Honestly i think you take people for jugs to be filled...
You want to improve on customer's back and good faith ...to test for you ...free ...i believe your pour the drop that full my cup of patience.
Mirage showed your stuff has absolutely NO absorbtive properties @ Ir 905nm , but you keep knitting it does one way or the other.
Usque tandem abutere, VG , patientia nostra?
You should patent this recipe that is tested and proven in lab
http://web.eecs.umich.edu/~minar/pdf...aper_UMICH.pdf
Here is my challenge , replicate this video ...and i will believe in V5 absorbtive properties
-
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Tman For This Useful Post:
Clint Eastwood (03-21-2015), Mirage (03-21-2015), modsl55amg (03-21-2015)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Connect With Us