Greetings from NYC

[ECMExpert]

I'm actually more interested in hearing what bs the cops are claiming to justify jammers being a cause for searches. (obviously without compromising any cases you are involved in, ethically or tactically)

Hey can't say names, BUT he can give circumstances and facts.

[curmudgeon]

Hey can't say names, BUT he can give circumstances and facts.

He might not want to tip his hand on any specific strategies he's about to use in a public post though. remember IANAL, but this does interest me to the extent that he can share. (or you two are willing to discuss in the open) Especially since he practices in the Peoples Republic of New Yawk.

[ECMExpert]

He might not want to tip his hand on any specific strategies he's about to use in a public post though. remember IANAL, but this does interest me to the extent that he can share. (or you two are willing to discuss in the open) Especially since he practices in the Peoples Republic of New Yawk.

Its all public. He doesn't need to breach any confidentiality, BUT I am questioning the use of jammers as a basis for a search of the vehicle and /or its occupants. So you're lidar cant get a reading on my car. How does that reach the level of probable cause or reasonable suspicion to search?? (yes, I understand that they can make sh^% up), BUT that ONLY goes so far. AND, how many guys who DO have parking sensors have really been stopped and cited?? Very few if any on here?? (unless they're RR clients) .

Hypothetical, I've got a matte black car with passive CMs and a V1 that's HOT on lidar. YOU can't get a reading on me and stop me anyway to give me another look. IN the absence of the smell of an illegal substance or otherwise horrible driving (DUI) , what could they possibly conjure UP that would give rise to a search (UNLESS you of course consent).