RALETC LIDAR Jammer Testing Meet. September 21

[Mirage]

The results are posted! http://www.raletc.com/2014/09/raletc...sting-results/

Note to Specifics and RigToFly:
Did you guys keep sheets from your runs? I appear to be missing some of your results.

[Salty]

The results are posted! http://www.raletc.com/2014/09/raletc...sting-results/

Note to Specifics and RigToFly:
Did you guys keep sheets from your runs? I appear to be missing some of your results.

Nice layout and commentary.

[RigToFly01]

The results are posted! http://www.raletc.com/2014/09/raletc...sting-results/

Note to Specifics and RigToFly:
Did you guys keep sheets from your runs? I appear to be missing some of your results.

I agree. F*CKING FANTASTIC JOB! I sent you specifics results. the only thing you were missing from me was the XLR which was JTG/JFG.

[FJR1300]

You mentioned that a 3rd head should be on the same plane as the other two. Would this mean that all dual front or all dual rear heads should also be on the same plane?
I set up my rears with the left rear slightly higher than the right to try and account for different angles between level and overpass shots. BRD thought this was fine at that time, has further testing shown this not to be the case any longer?

[Mirage]

You mentioned that a 3rd head should be on the same plane as the other two. Would this mean that all dual front or all dual rear heads should also be on the same plane?
I set up my rears with the left rear slightly higher than the right to try and account for different angles between level and overpass shots. BRD thought this was fine at that time, has further testing shown this not to be the case any longer?

you are a special case with a small footprint I probably wouldn't recommend that for you. BRD and I talk about this stuff quite a bit so if he told you to do something then I would stick with it.

With respect to this test the user had a triple setup with 2 heads on the upper part of the front facia and 1 head in the lower portion of the grille. This is not optimal because you increase the risk of cross talk between the sensors.

[dinkydi]

nothing is perfect , all results very nicely laid out thanks again ,well done by all

[FJR1300]

you are a special case with a small footprint I probably wouldn't recommend that for you. BRD and I talk about this stuff quite a bit so if he told you to do something then I would stick with it.

With respect to this test the user had a triple setup with 2 heads on the upper part of the front facia and 1 head in the lower portion of the grille. This is not optimal because you increase the risk of cross talk between the sensors.

Gotcha, I do have my tag light housing that protrudes between the rear sensors.
It wasn't so much that BRD advised me to do that, as I thought about it and asked if it was okay, just didn't want to give the impression that conflicting advice had been given.

Thanks for the reply.

[RedRocket]

Great job on a very easy format to read results from.- Time to finally rest & kick back now,it's Miller time(or higher octane ) in the Lone Star State.

[specifics]

Note to Specifics and RigToFly:
Did you guys keep sheets from your runs? I appear to be missing some of your results.

I only made the few runs before everyone showed up that was posted..... I was having too much fun in that Altima... lol Those results are awesome and well done... very professional and easily comparable.....

[RigToFly01]

I only made the few runs before everyone showed up that was posted..... I was having too much fun in that Altima... lol

Ya, sure you were!