RALETC LIDAR Jammer Testing Meet. September 21

[Yellowcab]

Look forward to seeing you guys again!

Vg

HEY! WHO INVITED YOU?














Bob, you are always welcome to join us.

[Yellowcab]

added attendee list to OP

[Yellowcab]

OP updated.

[Salty]

Looking forward to seeing old faces, and meeting some new ones!

[Veil Guy]

HEY! WHO INVITED YOU?

That's all right. I won't go then...

You guys have fun!

VG

[RedRocket]

That's all right. I won't go then...

VG

If you don't attend we'll call-in a BOLO to LE on you !

[RigToFly01]

If you don't attend we'll call-in a BOLO to LE on you !

BE ON THE LOOKOUT for Doc Brown!

[RigToFly01]

I updated the sheets we used last time. There was only room for 12 different cars and setups per sheet. Does anyone see anything that I missed or needs adding?

[Veil Guy]

You know what I believe would be very useful?

Instead of recording close range punch through distances only, use a format of attempting to clock from long range to close range all of the way after each successful reading, repeated re-attempts though the entire range.

In my experiences with either active, passive, or both, PTs can happen at specific times at a variety of distances not just close range.

I would enjoy seeing a test done that way, some day. A lot of useful data could come out of such a test.

VG

[Radarrob]

You know what I believe would be very useful?

Instead of recording close range punch through distances only, use a format of attempting to clock from long range to close range all of the way after each successful reading, repeated re-attempts though the entire range.

In my experiences with either active, passive, or both, PTs can happen at specific times at a variety of distances not just close range.

I would enjoy seeing a test done that way, some day. A lot of useful data could come out of such a test.

VG

Great idea! but the problem with this would be weather conditions.Temperature,humidity,sunlight and operator error come into play possible.