Quote Originally Posted by BestRadarDetectors View Post
The Claims in this video are not ALP claims. They are the claims that Laser Interceptor makes. AntiLaser has never promised support for unknown guns but we do go out and acquire just about every gun possible to make sure the customers are protected. If we cant get a gun we will try to borrow one or even find people in enforcement willing to let us record their police issued guns or record them ourselves with the built in recorder in the field. Every customer can be part of the solution and a quick recording can be emailed and support will be in the next update. The first 5 or so Laser Ally gun Algo's were done without AntiLaser even having a gun in their possession. The ALP also uses its own proprietary software which is a game changer and it can operate like no other jammer conventional jammer. We cant explain how the ALP can accomplish what it does and I am sure you all can understand why we cant discuss it.
Oh, "It Jams all known and unknown lidar guns" is an LI claim, not an ALP claim? I read that wrong then. Rewatching the video, I see what you're saying. Thanks for clarifying.

The fact that the first five Laser Ally algorithms were jammed without ever even having the gun is pretty awesome. Realistically, it's near impossible for any jammer manufacturer to get ahold of every version of the gun, so this is pretty huge.

I understand if you can't publicly share the inner workings of the ALP's proprietary software. What are some of the features and benefits of its jamming capabilities beyond "Well we have a jamming algorithm for this and they don't?" Jammer companies do issue updates periodically so unless the ALP can do something that its competitors won't ever be able to do, it's only a matter of time before other companies release their updates and the playing field is level again.