Close
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27
  1. #21
    Senior Member dinkydi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    cosmos
    Posts
    3,739
    Thanks Given
    4,432
    Thanked 1,222 Times in 911 Posts
    that's true, just have to keep peeper's sharp and report

  2. #22
    Junior Member orwellophile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    19
    Thanks Given
    1
    Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by winterbrew View Post
    Watch out VIC's, was having a dig around on that website, searched for DragonEye ;

    http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/si...013450/s4.html
    Well researched. I got caught up at

    Code:
    "prescribed illicit drug" means—
    
            (a)     methylamphetamine; or
    
            (ab)     3, 4-Methylenedioxy- N -Methylamphetamine (MDMA);
    
            (b)     delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol;
    I think that means if you're only high on (3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine; tenamfetamine) MDA, then you're fine to drive?

  3. #23
    Junior Member orwellophile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    19
    Thanks Given
    1
    Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
    The full list for VIC is at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/v...09289/s41.html

    Good to see the prolaser ii is still good... although not sure what it means by "auslaser", mine shows it's display in km/h but it says nothing about auslaser

    Code:
    ROAD SAFETY (GENERAL) REGULATIONS 2009 - REG 41
    
    Prescribed speed detectors
    For the purposes of the definition of prescribed speed detector in section 3(1) of the Act, the following speed detectors are prescribed—
    
            (a)     a digitector; and
    
            (b)     the following laser devices—
    
    Reg. 41(b)(i) revoked by S.R. No. 118/2013 reg. 4(1).
    
        *     *     *     *     *
    
                  (ii)     the Prolaser 11 Model Auslaser;
    
    Reg. 41(b)(iii) revoked by S.R. No. 118/2013 reg. 4(1).
    
        *     *     *     *     *
    
                  (iv)     the Prolaser III;
    
                  (v)     the Pro-Lite;
    
    Reg. 41(b)(vi) substituted by S.R. No. 118/2013 reg. 4(2).
    
                  (vi)         the Pro-Lite +;
    
    Reg. 41(b)(vii) inserted by S.R. No. 118/2013 reg. 4(2).
    
                  (vii)     the ProLaser 4 (also known as the PROLASER 4);
    
    Reg. 41(b)(viii) inserted by S.R. No. 118/2013 reg. 4(2).
    
                  (viii)     the DragonEye Compact (also known as the DragonEye COMPACT); and

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    North America
    Posts
    605
    Thanks Given
    519
    Thanked 287 Times in 181 Posts
    Out of the list of guns I would watch out for Prolaser 4.
    Telling the truth and exposing the lies in the lidar and radar industry

    "I'm interested to see how well you do.I never seen a car JTG before would be a first for me.."

  5. #25
    Senior Member shanetrainST's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,870
    Thanks Given
    1,401
    Thanked 1,771 Times in 849 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Radarrob View Post
    Out of the list of guns I would watch out for Prolaser 4.
    Please dont tell me that KS is having a crack a VPS/DET with the PL4

  6. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    North America
    Posts
    605
    Thanks Given
    519
    Thanked 287 Times in 181 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by shanetrainST View Post
    Please dont tell me that KS is having a crack a VPS/DET with the PL4
    Idk but out of that list the older lidars aren't a threat.Awile ago I called it that other manufacturers would be doing what dragon did.The PL4 is a nice safisticated unit.
    Telling the truth and exposing the lies in the lidar and radar industry

    "I'm interested to see how well you do.I never seen a car JTG before would be a first for me.."

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Radarrob For This Useful Post:

    dinkydi (01-15-2015)

  8. #27
    Senior Member RedRocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    North America
    Posts
    2,057
    Thanks Given
    1,081
    Thanked 1,543 Times in 846 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by shanetrainST View Post
    Please dont tell me that KS is having a crack a VPS/DET with the PL4
    It wouldn't surprise me if it came to be,eventually.Afterall- it's the same Mfg who designed & built both Lidars.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to RedRocket For This Useful Post:

    dinkydi (01-15-2015)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •