Close
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #15
    Moderator winterbrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    1,803
    Thanks Given
    1,850
    Thanked 1,697 Times in 929 Posts
    Looks like there is some more info on invalid infringements ;

    Poliscanspeed Court Evidence 2011 Germany Traffic Test Case Poliscanspeed Court Evidence

    Except "... It must be noted that the height of the perspective evaluation template according to the manufacturer's instructions should always be exactly 1 m - no tolerance , not roughly , not " there-abouts " - but exactly 1 m. This perspective is, however, not amount calibrated size and therefore to be regarded not necessarily as safe..." Google Translation.
    http://www.policespeedcameras.info/i...gal-fines.html

    So now we know that the evaluation template height should always be 1m, as well as Vitronic's existing guidelines for valid photo evidence
    2 x ALPriority (Quint) with STi-R+ and BT/HiFi/GPS integration | V1C (sold) | Bel RX65 S7 | 2015 Intl Redline Pro-A (sold) | Uniden R3 | Uniden LRD950 (sold) | Stalker Lidar | UltraLyte LRB | Kustom Raptor RP-1 2 x K band, 1 x Ka band antennas | Decatur Genesis-II K band |

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to winterbrew For This Useful Post:

    beingaware (05-07-2014), dinkydi (05-07-2014)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •