We have many people that want to run 1 Regular + 1 TX Sensor in the rear and have voiced their concern with how awkward an install can look with 2 different size sensors in the rear. We decided to make an affordable adapter so if someone want to run a TX Sensor in a regular sensor enclosure that is now possible.
Attachment 5812
I'll nibble..... This is spooky, no replies with numerous likes makes me wonder if its a ruse.
No ruse.. just an inexpensive way ($14.95) to mount a TX Sensor in a regular housing for those that would like the option.Quote:
Originally Posted by gapi
I have to take better pictures before I put them on the website.
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...61d6eb8e4c.jpg
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
The things you do for people that always complain about small issues BRD--Thanks!
You know I have to ask about what lens material the TX has to shoot through or if it lessens the effectiveness any?
How do they secure on?
I believe I am a candidate.
Attachment 5829
I have tucked the TX in to match the RX since this photo.
Attachment 5830
Attachment 5831
It's the same material that AL heads are made out of. It's a real regular sensor enclosure. Opening is cut to let a TX Sensor fit in tightly.Quote:
Originally Posted by gapi
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Have these been added to the ALPriorityUSA.com website yet? I could not locate them. Thanks.Quote:
Originally Posted by BestRadarDetectors
I'll try to add them tomorrow. Been crazy busy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chelaw
No worries - thanks, BRD.Quote:
Originally Posted by BestRadarDetectors
For this feature then, there is an additional 11 % IR energy loss for the TX output which would be Total 22 % b/c of the 2nd layer of IRT lens material.Quote:
Originally Posted by BestRadarDetectors
... and for those that don't yet have ALPs, they can install these empty enclosures to impress their friends...:frusty:
Has any testing been done with these enclosures for real life reduction of effectiveness?
How can it reduce effectiveness, that is just crazy to even think that lol--putting it into the enclosure will have Zero effect
I've done a few runs Test on a Triple AL-P Front install that had 2-layers of IRT material...he was JTG w/ 1 P/T on the Driver HL @ 945ft.Quote:
Originally Posted by tphank1
You do suffer an additional 11% photon energy loss from inserting a 2nd IRT lens in Front of the TX lens !Quote:
Originally Posted by Holla