I'll bring a camera!! 😁
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Printable View
I'll bring a camera!! 😁
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Meet up location will be pmed later tonight.
I need someone to bring trash bags.
Make sure to take a picture of all the guns. Man I wish I could be there. Hopefully next time.
Ill bring some in case there is a nasty PT.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellowcab
Wishing you a ll a fun, safe, & LEO free trip there and back, camaraderie, and a productive and learning day, all with perfect weather. The rest of us eagerly await the results. Just make sure the color schemes are correct on the spreadsheet:boink:
I am leaving in 30 mins or so to head down there. Hopefully I can find RedRocket and the Hotel he is at. "leave the lights on!"
Pms sent
My DragonEye guns are packed and I have extra AA Batteries & C's if we need them. See everyone tomorrow.
Packed up and ready to roll.
Locked and loaded.If anyone driving on NJTP or 95 from MD-DE we on the
look out for heavy laser enforcement tomorrow.
Good luck guys. Have fun! Can't wait for the results....
Drive safe, guys. Looking forward to the results! :)
I don't know if anyone's checking this thread while at the meet, but someone presented a scenario on RDF that should be tested.
Someone mentioned that if you shoot a TSS at an LI, then afterward shoot a PL3, the PL3 will get IPT. I don't know if he power cycled the LI in between each gun or not, but this scenario should be tested while people and the guns are all together.
I've tested it. It will if you shoot immediately afterwards because LI remembers the last gun shot to avoid an additional lookup during trigger cycling. If you cycle the LI your fine.Quote:
Originally Posted by radargeek
Others have tested and not replicated this issue. Perhaps it only affects certain CPUs? I wonder if the affected CPUs are older ones?Quote:
Originally Posted by mirage
I don't believe it is an issue. It's just the nature of the jammer. It all depends on the amount of time spent between switching guns. I can't remember the exact timeout Cliff told me once, but it's been a long time.Quote:
Originally Posted by licwid
FYI the team tested this today and did not find any issues with the latest LI 8.15 firmware.
We seem to have drifted OT, sorry. I am interested im seeing the results too!
Back in Maryland safe and sound. Thanks guys for a very informative event. Opened my eyes A LOT. Hope to do it again real soon. Yellow Cab I'll send you all the picture and you can decided what you want to do with them.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Nice meeting you.Thank you for coming out.Quote:
Originally Posted by SunTzuAOW
So you guys finished testing?
Any bulletins on the 8.15 ?
We did not notice any difference from 8.14, Yellowcab is probably still on the way home and will post results tonight.Quote:
Originally Posted by spankyaf
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk
Did the K40 Rep show up?? I bet that system got tore up
Took about 3 and half hours to get home. It was a blast and a good time was had by all.
No rep but we did have a k40 there but there was a problem with it. It did not jam anything. We assume it needs a new CPU.Quote:
Originally Posted by Holla
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk
I just got home. Overall a very good day. I got to meet three members of the community that I haven't met before. We got to test two ALP installations, an LI installation and did some Veil testing.
Here are some highlights.
Car without any jammers and with out Veil, LIDAR used DALA: 3900 feet
Same car with Veil on headlights and fog lights no license plate: 1300 feet
LI 8.15 vs. Truspeed S now is JTG. A big improvement from 8.14
LI 8.15 vs. DET Compact: No alert no jam
LI 8.15 vs DALA #5 no alert no jam
LI 8.15 vs Stalker XLR alert no jam
ALP vs. DALA #5 alert no jam
ALP vs. DET Compact: Winner: ALP by a knockout.
LI 8.15: We did not experience the TSS followed by IPT when shot with PL4 and PL3 and we shot the TSS for the first half of the run waited a few seconds and then shot it with a pl3 or pl4.
Veil Guy needs to buy a DeLorean.
Why no jam from alp vs number 5?
We are researching why it didn't work today because it did work previously on my car (on beta firmware). So at this point its under investigation.Quote:
Originally Posted by SLO
Too bad I missed it. Every northeast meet that happens I can never make it. Being a wage slave sucks, and weekends are way too short. Maybe I need a DeLorean too, with the time travel package.
Some people on RDF still are reporting PL3 issues with 8.15, but nailing down a pattern has as of yet been impossible. We seemed to rule out the TSS-followed-by-PL3 theory I came up with this morning.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellowcab
Well Color Me Impressed.....that is quite significant !
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellowcab
I agree this was truly impressive.Quote:
Originally Posted by TurboDriver
This should explain the problems with number 5:Quote:
Originally Posted by SLO
http://youtu.be/VKF3iJQBWuo?t=23s
Truspeed #2 had faster speed locks then compact
and laser ally.
truspeed tore us up in the last meet i went to... i was surprised. tight beam.Quote:
Originally Posted by Radarrob
Truspeed #2 is a whole different ball game. This unit is different then reg truspeed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Con40mb
Too bad several guys could not make it. I was however nice meeting some new guys today! Hope you guys are hooked and come to the next one.
RESULTS ARE UP http://radarandlaserforum.com/showth...LTS-April-2014
I would like to also note that the v1 detector alerted to all
lidar guns used.
Thanks for the results guys! I would like to know why the DALA #5 gave the ALP such a problem. Mirage is on top of it.
Its a Brand New gun that has never seen this ALP firmware. While the LI was quiet to this one as well the ALP did alert immediately. Some past beta firmware we have run Jammed it already but the latest production release did not. We will investigate and get it resolved quickly.Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfpacal