RALETC Laser Jammer Meet RESULTS April 2014

How critical is it for the heads to be on the same plane, as long as the three axis are at 0* on each head?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tman

This is the reason i suggested to take a pic of every car , same distance same height same camera.

---

I was going to, but some people didn't want their rides out there. :black_eyed:

Hey, I know they probably didn't do well (OK, I know they didn't at all) but Tom had mentioned that there would be some K40 "defusers" out there, I thought. If so, how'd they do?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ReggieB

Hey, I know they probably didn't do well (OK, I know they didn't at all) but Tom had mentioned that there would be some K40 "defusers" out there, I thought. If so, how'd they do?

---

Was not alerting to any guns..... We then came to the conclusion that the unit was bad and we stopped testing it.

There have been a few requests at RDF want to see these results after hearing about them. Not sure how admin over here wants to handle these requests since I am sure they will continue. I have posted a link over there to this thread. I know there is a RALTEC section over there (RDF) now but I didn't think it was my place to copy/paste these results without first checking how you guys feel about the best way to present these results.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by patsy1099

There have been a few requests at RDF want to see these results after hearing about them. Not sure how admin over here wants to handle these requests since I am sure they will continue. I have posted a link over there to this thread. I know there is a RALTEC section over there (RDF) now but I didn't think it was my place to copy/paste these results without first checking how you guys feel about the best way to present these results.

---

In an email between XYD and I, we agreed to post testing results on one forum, not both so that there will be one discussion about the testing. If there are discussions in two separate locations some members may miss important information and discussion about the testing. We also agreed to allow linking to the other forum.

When the other members of RALETC's bans on RDF are reversed, we can post a future meet's results on RDF.

Makes perfect sense. Thanks for the clarification.

Would it be best to post the link in a thread, in the raltec section, that said "testing results", and then pointed back here? Because otherwise people tend to ask the question in various threads/posts and I can see having to paste the link multiple times.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by patsy1099

Makes perfect sense. Thanks for the clarification.

Would it be best to post the link in a thread, in the raltec section, that said "testing results", and then pointed back here? Because otherwise people tend to ask the question in various threads/posts and I can see having to paste the link multiple times.

---

Yes, sounds like a great idea.

Look I'm not the RALTEC secretary, unless it pays a lot or includes free equipment! j/k

Ok here it is:

http://www.rdforum.org/showthread.ph...776#post444776

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Yellowcab

DALA #5 has not been recorded or seen by any laser jammer manufacturer.

---

NOW that it has, is ALP going to address the issue???