Originally Posted by
Vortex
Were you able to measure that yourself or was it on the certification documentation? It'd be fun to test that out manually and not have to send it out.- (No mini-test chamber as required,nor a wattmeter for GHz freq. for that Power level)... I got it for a reasonable price (knowing what they typically sell for) & had a Calib. Lab do a full Certification on it just to be sure all ok.
That's a good idea. Battery life on these units is pretty excellent and while I assume that the output power on battery should be comparable to a power cable, I have no way of verifying that. Skimming through the documentation, I see no mention of output power being dependent upon the power source.- Simple formula for Power...P= EI & as battery handle drains voltage starts decreasing & you're not able to sink same level of current either to maintain full output.
The terrain that we have here isn't conducive to those sorts of tests. In fact it's one reason why I love seeing other people's tests where they have long flat straightaways. It's all curves, hills, and trees here. Finding a straightaway of even a mile or so typically requires driving way out of the way, and even then you have other cars which'll be driving around and so I won't be able to test the full length of the course to test out maximum range. So there's some tests that I can do here and some that are tough at best. It sounds like that may be a test that you'd be able to conduct more easily than I would.- Not even outside Metro areas,within 25mi away ? That's where I have to look to find 2-3mi straightaways. I only have 1 K-band & 1 Ka-band radar, not the collection of Models you own. I splurge all my benjamins on Lidars. We share the same sickness, just the other side of the coin. :encouragement:
haha, well while I've seen detection range against Stalker be just fine in other tests which would lead me to believe there's not something wonky about this unit in particular, I really appreciate you also taking a look at the different possibilities and variables that could be leading to these results *independent of* the sensitivity of the RD's. It's something that's absolutely critical to testing and I love that other people may think of possibilities that never crossed my mind. It's kind of like open source radar detector testing. :p