AL Priority in action videos

[winterbrew]

If anyone want's to check out the ALP in action, please feel free to browse my YouTube channel, which currently has 19 videos of the ALP in action ;

http://www.youtube.com/user/jonctr/videos

Due to every day occurence of the VPS in our area, they're all of the Vitronic PoliscanSpeed automated lidar camera - I've yet to be targeted with a handheld outside of testing :)

19 encounters in just less than four months since installation :)

[Firemedic]

Great videos :)

Thanks.

[deano]

here is one of WB tests with my PL2 ....also on the day we had the stalker and LRB... WB will be able to fill you guys in on the guns software but all 3 guns where JTG and JFG


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJz3JUCY0KU

[BestRadarDetectors]

here is one of WB tests with my PL2 ....also on the day we had the stalker and LRB... WB will be able to fill you guys in on the guns software but all 3 guns where jtg and JTG


Thanks for sharing. Its our first customer AL Priority video on the site.
Thanks Again for participating.

Tom

[dinkydi]

what would be good to see half way through a test, the jammers get switched off and back on again,

[RedRocket]

I've experienced how difficult it can be to hold "steady" on the target when it's such a windy day,isn't it!
You did quite well for the conditions.

[winterbrew]

Front heads (2No.) are 600mm (23") apart, angled out 10 degrees for Vitronic PoliscanSpeed.

Rear heads (3No.) are 600mm apart (outer head to outer head), angled 29 degrees out for PoliscanSpeed, with centre head between the two outer heads over the licence plate, at 0 degrees (straight ahead)

For those interested, the Stalker firmware was A 5.7 SUP, and the LRB was 3.02 (not shown in above video)

[BestRadarDetectors]

Front heads (2No.) are 600mm (23") apart, angled out 10 degrees for Vitronic PoliscanSpeed.

Rear heads (3No.) are 600mm apart (outer head to outer head), angled 29 degrees out for PoliscanSpeed, with centre head between the two outer heads over the licence plate, at 0 degrees (straight ahead)

For those interested, the Stalker firmware was A 5.7 SUP, and the LRB was 3.02 (not shown in above video)

While I know the AL Priority has the widest angle protection I am happy to see you still getting great performance with them positioned so far out at close to 30%. That single rear center head is doing its job well.

[winterbrew]

Yes, the two outers are purely for rear Poliscan protection.

I did however, draw it out in AutoCad fully scaled to ensure there were no gaps in the coverage, particularly in the rear when shot from behind at 10m (33') from a typical rear Poliscan setup shooting from the verge at 35deg (imported and scaled from Google Earth). Beyond about 10m, I should have some degree of overlapping protection from the rear heads due to the beam divergence.

10 deg out on the front is about the maximum, otherwise you open up a small channel of non-coverage at 0 deg straight ahead in front of the licence plate (depends on the size of the car and mounting positions of course)

[RedRocket]

Yes, the two outers are purely for rear Poliscan protection.

I did however, draw it out in AutoCad fully scaled to ensure there were no gaps in the coverage,- - -

10 deg out on the front is about the maximum, otherwise you open up a small channel of non-coverage at 0 deg straight ahead in front of the licence plate (depends on the size of the car and mounting positions of course)
Hey wb,have you seen the IR video of the AL-P Sensor that shows the beam divergence displayed in actual angle of spread in "degrees" ?

Scroll down to near the bottom of the page:
http://www.raletc.org/2013_10_01_archive.html?m=0

[winterbrew]

Hey wb,have you seen the IR video of the AL-P Sensor that shows the beam divergence displayed in actual angle of spread in "degrees" ?

Scroll down to near the bottom of the page:
http://www.raletc.org/2013_10_01_archive.html?m=0

Hey RedR,

Yes, I've seen the video on the blog, but can't remember the exact numbers. I based my AutoCad drawings on the previously advertised data, so will have a look at the video again, and re-visit my drawings :)

[Firemedic]

OK I can see the difference between the Blinder and the ALP but I need someone to explain the difference between the ALP and the LI :help:

[RedRocket]

OK I can see the difference between the Blinder and the ALP but I need someone to explain the difference between the ALP and the LI :help:
Both have approx. the same horiz. IR divergence,but in the vert. plane the LI has less (noticeably "thinner").
Also,the AL-P has a full-bodied,energy saturated,~equal distribution density throughout the whole IR pattern particle wavefront.

The same cannot be said about the other two models.Both exhibit large & small "dead zones" (Blackholes w/o energy radiated!) speckled throughout the IR pattern.These aberrations shouldn't be there in a quality product,IMO.I've looked at dozens of individual Sensor outputs from these 2 models & EVERY SINGLE ONE has these defects so far.I've also looked at LI/8.8 (4ea. only) & they were worse.

My preference is the clearly superior pattern & high output energy levels of the BEST of the 3.The Top Model choice can be seen in my Signature.

[Firemedic]

Thanks Red, when you go back and look at the videos with the explanation it stands out.

[deano]

what would be good to see half way through a test, the jammers get switched off and back on again,

the AL wont work that way once you kill the AL and if there is a lidar threat on start up AL will not start up ..the LI will I tested this on my drive way I started up the LI quickly ran to the front of the car and held my finger on the trigger once the park mode was deactivated I got the whoop whoops

[deano]

I've experienced how difficult it can be to hold "steady" on the target when it's such a windy day,isn't it!
You did quite well for the conditions.

thanks mate im normally good at holding the lidar but this day was windy but I found that I was shaking allot from the night earlier as I had a little to much to drink

[dinkydi]

nowt wrong with that mate :encouragement: