PDA

View Full Version : TX Sensor Enclosure for those wanting to match existing sensors


BestRadarDetectors
08-25-2017, 11:52 AM
We have many people that want to run 1 Regular + 1 TX Sensor in the rear and have voiced their concern with how awkward an install can look with 2 different size sensors in the rear. We decided to make an affordable adapter so if someone want to run a TX Sensor in a regular sensor enclosure that is now possible.

5812
gapi
08-26-2017, 09:57 AM
I'll nibble..... This is spooky, no replies with numerous likes makes me wonder if its a ruse.
BestRadarDetectors
08-26-2017, 10:48 AM
I'll nibble..... This is spooky, no replies with numerous likes makes me wonder if its a ruse.No ruse.. just an inexpensive way ($14.95) to mount a TX Sensor in a regular housing for those that would like the option.

I have to take better pictures before I put them on the website.

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20170826/062a339cf0ad8ecc22f02461d6eb8e4c.jpg

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Holla
08-26-2017, 11:59 AM
The things you do for people that always complain about small issues BRD--Thanks!
gapi
08-27-2017, 11:47 PM
You know I have to ask about what lens material the TX has to shoot through or if it lessens the effectiveness any?
How do they secure on?

I believe I am a candidate.

5829

I have tucked the TX in to match the RX since this photo.

5830

5831
BestRadarDetectors
08-28-2017, 01:01 PM
You know I have to ask about what lens material the TX has to shoot through or if it lessens the effectiveness any?
How do they secure on?

I believe I am a candidate.

5829

I have tucked the TX in to match the RX since this photo.

5830

5831It's the same material that AL heads are made out of. It's a real regular sensor enclosure. Opening is cut to let a TX Sensor fit in tightly.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Chelaw
09-07-2017, 12:37 PM
We have many people that want to run 1 Regular + 1 TX Sensor in the rear and have voiced their concern with how awkward an install can look with 2 different size sensors in the rear. We decided to make an affordable adapter so if someone want to run a TX Sensor in a regular sensor enclosure that is now possible.

5812

Have these been added to the ALPriorityUSA.com website yet? I could not locate them. Thanks.
BestRadarDetectors
09-07-2017, 12:40 PM
Have these been added to the ALPriorityUSA.com website yet? I could not locate them. Thanks.

I'll try to add them tomorrow. Been crazy busy.
Chelaw
09-07-2017, 01:06 PM
I'll try to add them tomorrow. Been crazy busy.

No worries - thanks, BRD.
RedRocket
09-07-2017, 05:51 PM
It's the same material that AL heads are made out of. It's a real regular sensor enclosure. Opening is cut to let a TX Sensor fit in tightly.For this feature then, there is an additional 11 % IR energy loss for the TX output which would be Total 22 % b/c of the 2nd layer of IRT lens material.
tphank1
09-08-2017, 09:30 AM
... and for those that don't yet have ALPs, they can install these empty enclosures to impress their friends...:frusty:

Has any testing been done with these enclosures for real life reduction of effectiveness?
Holla
09-08-2017, 11:25 AM
How can it reduce effectiveness, that is just crazy to even think that lol--putting it into the enclosure will have Zero effect
RedRocket
09-08-2017, 12:00 PM
... and for those that don't yet have ALPs, they can install these empty enclosures to impress their friends...:frusty:

Has any testing been done with these enclosures for real life reduction of effectiveness?I've done a few runs Test on a Triple AL-P Front install that had 2-layers of IRT material...he was JTG w/ 1 P/T on the Driver HL @ 945ft.


How can it reduce effectiveness, that is just crazy to even think that lol--putting it into the enclosure will have Zero effectYou do suffer an additional 11% photon energy loss from inserting a 2nd IRT lens in Front of the TX lens !