Close
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 50
  1. #31

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to gapi For This Useful Post:

    angrypenguin (08-27-2017), tphank1 (09-01-2017)

  3. #32
    Member angrypenguin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    99
    Thanks Given
    58
    Thanked 18 Times in 14 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by gapi View Post
    Googling around I found this brochure.

    dragoneye-compact-speed-lidar-nov15-v2-rgb.pdf
    Absolutely fantastic. Been trying to find this for a few days. Thanks man!

  4. #33
    Senior Member RedRocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    North America
    Posts
    2,057
    Thanks Given
    1,081
    Thanked 1,543 Times in 846 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by angrypenguin View Post
    Attachment 5817

    I have an issue with CM hits only. By definition, the vehicle I drive is a compact sedan. (same size as a Camry in the front end).

    Pls ignore the lines.
    Do not forget about my comments concerning the alignment issue I pointed out to you regarding the 2 'outer' Transponders !
    Last edited by RedRocket; 08-28-2017 at 03:25 PM.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to RedRocket For This Useful Post:

    angrypenguin (08-28-2017)

  6. #34
    Member angrypenguin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    99
    Thanks Given
    58
    Thanked 18 Times in 14 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by RedRocket View Post
    Do not forget about my comments concerning the alignment issue I pointed out to you regarding the 2 'outer' Transponders !
    Yup. Noted - not only am I dealing with that I'm getting a new grill because I'm tired of the painful install issues with the tx

    Go big or go home, as they say

  7. #35
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    3
    Thanks Given
    1
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    How do you measure if the Tx is above the horizontal plane of the other two sensors by 6-7"? For example, would it be fine if each of the 7.5" gaps in the original diagram were instead 10" (so 25.5" horizontally instead of 20.5") and the Tx was 6-7" above the horizontal plane of the other two sensors. Thanks.

  8. #36
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    27
    Thanks Given
    7
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by BestRadarDetectors View Post
    We have been talking with many customers with TX Sensors and discussing test results and one think is becoming clear... When sensors are mounted overall more than 30" apart it is creating some center issues. When using TX Sensors the Maximum distance from sensor to sensor can not exceed 30" Recommended spacing is closer to 24-26"

    Attachment 5814
    I am about to order some of these, but just to confirm, are you stating the maximum distance between each sensor as stated as between F1 and F3, or between F1 and F2 "TX"???

  9. #37
    Administrator Mirage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    1,146
    Thanks Given
    539
    Thanked 1,644 Times in 520 Posts

    TX Recommended Distances

    Quote Originally Posted by nuclearlaser View Post
    I am about to order some of these, but just to confirm, are you stating the maximum distance between each sensor as stated as between F1 and F3, or between F1 and F2 "TX"???
    He is referring to F1 and F3. The maximum distance should be less than 30"

    Best performance is around 23-26"
    Last edited by Mirage; 09-04-2017 at 06:03 PM.

    MirageTools.net
    - Laser CM Reviews and Tools
    RALETC.com - Radar and Laser Expert Testing Cooperative
    AL PRIORITY (Quint) w/BT, RG, & STiR | V1 3.892 + YAV1 | BlackVue DR650GW-2CH

  10. #38
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    27
    Thanks Given
    7
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mirage View Post
    He is referring to F1 and F3. The maximum distance should be less than 30"

    Best performance is around 23-26"
    Thanks for the reply, but what happens if the distance is around 33 inches between F1 and F3 with TX at F2? Punch through at center of mass? If the distance is brought within the specs laid out, then what about the headlamps on the outer edge of the vehicle that are vulnerable now? Almost sounds to me like we need to be able to keep all three receiver sensors and add the TX above or below F2 with the splitter version TX. Will this not work? Please advise.

  11. #39
    Member gapi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    78
    Thanks Given
    41
    Thanked 22 Times in 14 Posts
    You may not want to wander outside the recommendations. I'm not sure if the Dragon Eye's beam pattern spec of 30" @1000' is a factor but........... I feel your concern though. The install on my charger was a pain as can be with most cars. Good luck.

  12. #40
    Senior Member RedRocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    North America
    Posts
    2,057
    Thanks Given
    1,081
    Thanked 1,543 Times in 846 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Chelaw View Post
    How do you measure if the Tx is above the horizontal plane of the other two sensors by 6-7"? For example, would it be fine if each of the 7.5" gaps in the original diagram were instead 10" (so 25.5" horizontally instead of 20.5") and the Tx was 6-7" above the horizontal plane of the other two sensors. Thanks.
    On the diagonal would be a longer distance than measuring between them if all were on the same Horiz. plane & staying within the recommended spacing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •